Reger, Birgit, Lackner, Tomas und Zahner, Volker (AFZ-DerWald 21/2020)

Literaturhinweise aus „Aktiv Totholz schaffen? Das Projekt Hochstümpfe in Bayern“ von Birgit Reger, Tomas Lackner und Volker Zahner (AFZ-DerWald 21/2020):

[1] Abrahamsson, M.; Lindbladh, M. (2006): A comparison of saproxylic beetle occurrence between man-made high- and low-stumps of spruce (Picea abies). Forest Ecology and Management 226, S. 230-237.

[2] Arnett, E. B.; Kroll, A. J.; Duke, S.D. (2010): Avian foraging and nesting use of created snags in intensively-managed forests of western Oregon, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 260, S. 1773-1779.

[3] Barry, A. M.; Hagar, J. C.; Rivers, J. W. (2017): Long-term dynamics and characteristics of snags created for wildlife habitat. Forest Ecology and Management 403, S. 145-151.

[4] Blaschke, M.; Burmeister, J.; Endres, U.; Förster, B. (2012): Dem Totholz auf der Spur. LWF aktuell 86, S. 47-49.

[5] Bütler, R.; Schlaepfer, R. (2004): Wie viel Totholz braucht der Wald? Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen 155, S. 31-37.

[6] Christensen, M.; Hahn, K.; Mountford, E. P.; Ódor, P.; Standovár, T.; Rozenbergar, D.; Diaci, J.; Wijdeven, S.; Meyer, P.; Winter, S.; Vrska, T. (2005): Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves. Forest Ecology and Management 210, S. 267-282.

[7] Drapeau, P.; Nappi, A.; Imbeau, L.; Saint-Germain, M. (2009): Standing deadwood for keystone bird species in the eastern boreal forest: Managing for snag dynamics. Forestry Chronicle 85, S. 227-234.

[8] Grove, S. J. (2002): Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33, S. 1-23.

[9] Hallett, J. G.; Lopez, T.; O’Connell, M. A.; Borysewicz, M. A. (2001): Decay dynamics and avian use of artificially created snags. Northwest Science 75, Y. 378-386.

[10] Harmon, M. E.; Franklin, J. F.; Swanson, F. J.; Sollins, P.; Gregory, S. V.; Lattin, J. D.; Anderson, N. H.; Cline, S. P.; Aumen, N. G.; Sedell, J. R.; Lienkaemper, G. W.; Cromack Jr., K.; Cummins, K. W. (1986): Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 15, S. 133-302.

[11] Jonsell, M.; Weslien, J.; Ehnstrom, B. (1998): Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodiversity Conservation 7, S. 749-764.

[12] Jonsell, M.; Nittérus, K.; Stighäll, K. (2004): Saproxylic beetles in natural and man-made deciduous high stumps retained for conservation. Biological Conservation 118, S. 163-173.

[13] Jonsson, B. G.; Kruys, N. (Eds.) (2001): Ecology of woody debris in boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins 49.

[14] Jonsson, B. G.; Kruys, N.; Ranius, T. (2005): Ecology of species living on deadwood – Lessons for deadwood management. Silva Fennica 39, S. 289-309.

[15] Jonsson, M.; Ranius, T.; Ekvall, H.; Bostedt, G.; Dahlberg, A.; Ehnström, B.; Nordén, B.; Stokland, J. N. (2006): Cost-effectiveness of silvicultural measures to increase substrate availability for red-listed wood-living organisms in Norway spruce forests. Biological Conservation 127, S. 443-462.

[16] Jusino, M. A.; Lindner, D. L.; Banik, M. T.; Walters, J. R. (2015): Heart rot hotel: fungal communities in red-cockaded woodpecker excavations. Fungal Ecology 14, S. 33-43.

[17] Kilgo, J. C.; Vukovich, M. A. (2014): Can snag creation benefit a primary cavity nester: Response to an experimental pulse in snag abundance. Biological Conservation 171, S. 21-28.

[18] Kroll, A. J.; Duke, S. D.; Hane, M. E.; Johnson, J. R.; Rochelle, M.; Betts, M. G.; Arnett, E. B. (2012): Landscape composition influences avian colonization of experimentally created snags. Biological Conservation 152, S. 145-151.

[19] Lachat, T.; Brang, P.; Bolliger, M.; Bollmann, K.; Brändli, U.-B.; Bütler, R.; Herrmann, S.; Schneider, O.; Wermelinger, B. (2019): Totholz im Wald – Entstehung, Bedeutung und Förderung. Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt WSL, Merkblatt für die Praxis 52, S. 1-12.

[20] Lindhe, A.; Lindelöw, A. (2004): Cut high stumps of spruce, birch, aspen and oak as breeding substrates for saproxylic beetles. Forest Ecology and Management 203, S. 1-20.

[21] Mikusiński, G.; Gromadzki, M.; Chylarecki, P. (2001): Woodpeckers as indicators of forest bird diversity. Conservation Biology 15, S. 208-217.

[22] Nieto, A.; Alexander, K. N. A. (2010): European Red List of saproxylic beetles. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 45 S.

[23] Ranius, T.; Ekvall, H.; Jonsson, M.; Bostedt, G. (2005): Cost-efficiency of measures to increase the amount of coarse woody debris in managed Norway spruce forests. Forest Ecology and Management 206, S. 119-133.

[24] Ranius, T.; Caruso, A.; Jonsell, M.; Juutinen, A.; Thor, G.; Rudolphi, J. (2014): Dead wood creation to compensate for habitat loss from intensive forestry. Biological Conservation 169, S. 277-284.

[25] Rolle, C. (2019): Erfassung von xylobionten Insekten im Totholz anhand ihrer Bohrlöcher und Hackspuren von Spechten als Indikator einer hohen Insektenanzahl. Bachelorarbeit, Hochschule Weihenstephan-Triesdorf.

[26] Sandström, J.; Bernes, C.; Junninen, K.; Lõhmus, A.; Macdonald, E.; Müller, J.; Jonsson, B. G. (2019): Impacts of dead‐wood manipulation on the biodiversity of temperate and boreal forests. A systematic review. Journal of Applied Ecology 56, S. 1770-1781.

[27] Schmidt, O. (2006): Totes Holz voller Leben. LWF aktuell 53, S. 1.

[28] Schmidt, O. (2015): Naturnahe Forstwirtschaft fördert Artenvielfalt. LWF aktuell 104, S. 12-16.

[29] Seibold, S.; Bässler, C.; Brandl, R.; Gossner, M. M.; Thorn, S.; Ulyshen, M. D.; Müller, J. (2015): Experimental studies of dead-wood biodiversity — A review identifying global gaps in knowledge. Biological Conservation 191, S. 139-149.

[30] Seibold, S.; Bässler, C.; Brandl, R.; Büche, B.; Szallies, A.; Thorn, S.; Ulyshen, M.D.; Müller, J. (2016): Microclimate and habitat heterogeneity as the major drivers of beetle diversity in dead wood. Journal of Applied Ecology 53, S. 934-943.

[31] Siitonen, J. (2001): Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecological Bulletins 49, S. 11-41.

[32] Speight, M. C. (1989): Saproxylic invertebrates and their conservation. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 79 S.

[33] Stokland, J. N.; Siitonen, J.; Jonsson, B. G. (2012): Biodiversity in dead wood. Cambridge University Press, 509 S.

[34] Ulyshen, M. D. (2018): Saproxylic insects: Diversity, ecology and conservation. Springer, Zoological Monographs, 904 S.

[35] Vandekerkhove, K.; De Keersmaeker, L.; Menke, N.; Meyer, P.; Verschelde, P. (2009): When nature takes over from man: Dead wood accumulation in previously managed oak and beech woodlands in North-western and Central Europe. Forest Ecology and Management 258, S. 425-435.

[36] Vítková, L.; Bače, R.; Kjučukov, P.; Svoboda, M. (2018): Deadwood management in Central European forests: Key considerations for practical implementation. Forest Ecology and Management 429, S. 394-405.

[37] Wesolowski, T. (2002): Anti-predator adaptions in nesting Marsh Tits Parus palustris: the role of nest-site security. Ibis 144, S. 593-601.

[38] Winter, S.; Möller, G. C. (2008): Microhabitats in lowland beech forests as monitoring tool for nature conservation. Forest Ecology and Management 255, S. 1251-1261.

[39] Winter, S.; Begehold, H.; Herrmann, M.; Lüderitz, M.; Möller, G.; Rzanny, M.; Flade, M. (2015): Praxishandbuch – Naturschutz im Buchenwald. Naturschutzziele und Bewirtschaftungsempfehlungen für reife Buchenwälder Nordostdeutschlands. Landesvermessung und Geobasisinformation Brandenburg, Potsdam, 186 S.

[40] Zahner, V.; Sikora, L.; Pasinelli, G. (2012): Heart rot as a key factor for cavity tree selection in the black woodpecker. Forest Ecology and Management 271, S. 98-103.

[41] Zahner, V.; Bauer, R.; Kaphegyi, T. A. (2017): Are Black Woodpecker (Dryocopus martius) tree cavities in temperate Beech (Fagus sylvatica) forests an answer to depredation risk? Journal of Ornithology 158, S. 1073-1079.

[42] Zahner, V.; Wimmer, N. (2019): Spechte & Co.: Sympathische Hüter heimischer Wälder. AULA-Verlag, 168 S.